Ziebart: Merger taught BMW tough lessons
Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • Automotive News Canada
  • Automotive News Europe
  • Automotive News Mexico
  • Automotive News China
AN-LOGO-BLUE
Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • Account
  • login
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Dealers
    • Automakers & Suppliers
    • News by Brand
    • Cars & Concepts
    • Shift
    • Mobility Report
    • Special Reports
    • Digital Edition Archive
    • This Week's Issue
    • Self-driving cars might make people sick to their stomachs
      Going Hollywood
      Q&A with Chris Bangle
      A penny for your thoughts
    • Daimler, BMW will invest $1.13 billion in mobility JV to rival Uber
      Lyft plans to file for IPO next week, reports say
      Apple sheds light on safety of its AV program
      GM launches 'Vehicle Locate' app
    • Dealerships owned by ex-NFL stars face collapse, litigation
      Want a luxury car? Try a Kia
      Costly lesson of tortuous legal battle: Get it in writing
      Denny Hecker: A changed man?
    • Access F&I
    • Fixed Ops Journal
    • Marketing
    • Used Cars
    • Sales
    • Best Practices
    • Dealership Buy/Sell
    • NADA
    • NADA Show
    • Automakers
    • Manufacturing
    • Suppliers
    • Regulations & Safety
    • Executives
    • Leading Woman Network
    • PACE Awards
    • CES
    • Management Briefing Seminars
    • World Congress
    • Aston Martin
    • BMW
      • Mini
      • Rolls Royce
    • Daimler
      • Mercedes Benz
      • Smart
    • Fiat Chrysler
      • Alfa Romeo
      • Chrysler
      • Dodge
      • Ferrari
      • Fiat
      • Jeep
      • Maserati
      • Ram
    • Ford
      • Lincoln
    • General Motors
      • Buick
      • Cadillac
      • Chevrolet
      • GMC
      • Holden
    • Honda
      • Acura
    • Hyundai
      • Genesis
      • Kia
    • Mazda
    • Mitsubishi
    • Nissan
      • Infiniti
    • PSA
      • Citroen
      • Opel
      • Peugeot
      • Vauxhall
    • Renault
    • Subaru
    • Suzuki
    • Tata
      • Jaguar
      • Land Rover
    • Tesla
    • Toyota
      • Lexus
    • Volkswagen
      • Audi
      • Bentley
      • Bugatti
      • Lamborghini
      • Porsche
      • Seat
      • Skoda
    • Volvo
    • (Discontinued Brands)
    • Auto Shows
      • Detroit Auto Show
      • New York Auto Show
      • Los Angeles Auto Show
      • Chicago Auto Show
      • Geneva Auto Show
      • Paris Auto Show
      • Frankfurt Auto Show
      • Toronto Auto Show
      • Tokyo Auto Show
      • Shanghai Auto Show
      • Beijing Auto Show
    • Future Product Pipeline
    • Photo Galleries
    • Car Cutaways
    • Design
  • OPINION
    • Blogs
    • Cartoons
    • Keith Crain
    • Automotive Views with Jason Stein
    • Columnists
    • Editorials
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Send us a Letter
    • Is Honda's U.K. plant closure the beginning of a Japanese Brexit?
      Tesla introduces 'Dog Mode' to keep pets cool inside the car
      A GM investment in Rivian would send the wrong messages
      Bad policy, worse political strategy on auto tariffs
    • Dealers need to be ready for anything
      EVs will come with economic cost
      Spend money on sales, not stores
      Put it on your bucket list
    • Feb. 22, 2019: Tesla goes from disruptor to disrupted
      Feb. 15, 2019: EV startup gets Amazon, GM interest
      Jan. 4, 2019 | Bumpy road ahead for Detroit’s automakers and suppliers?
    • Bad policy, worse political strategy on auto tariffs
      Elaine Chao: A speedier path for innovation
      Industry initiatives seek to ease tech shortage, but challenges remain
      Drivers for ride-hailing services can be a prime source of fixed ops profits
    • NADA can help fight stair step incentives
      Let dealers invest in innovation, not renovations
      Hackett's vision for Ford is still a blur
      The last temptation of Elon Musk
    • Customer-centric approach set Tesla apart
      Cadillac falls short on marketing, luxury
      Thank you, Sting, for Oshawa efforts
      Deeper issues in tech shortage
  • DATA CENTER
  • VIDEO
    • AutoNews Now
    • First Shift
    • Special Video Reports
    • Weekend Drive
  • EVENTS & AWARDS
    • Events
    • Awards
    • World Congress
    • Retail Forum: NADA
    • Canada Congress
    • Marketing 360: L.A.
    • Europe Congress
    • Fixed Ops Journal Forum
    • Retail Forum: Chicago
    • Leading Women Conference Detroit
    • 100 Leading Woman
    • 40 Under 40 Retail
    • All-Stars
    • Best Dealership To Work For
    • PACE Awards
    • Rising Stars
    • Europe Rising Stars
  • JOBS
  • +MORE
    • Webinars
    • Leading Women Network
    • Custom Features
    • Classifieds
    • People on the Move
    • Newsletters
    • Contact Us
    • Media Kit
    • Ally: Do It Right
    • Guide To Economic Development
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Automakers & Suppliers
February 28, 2000 12:00 AM

Ziebart: Merger taught BMW tough lessons

Lindsay Chappell
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Print

    One automaker prides itself on engineering excellence. Another prides itself on its command of cost and process. When BMW AG merged with Rover Group six years ago, managers believed those strengths would complement each other and make for a strong marriage. But as BMW product development chief Wolfgang Ziebart explains, one united company must have one united culture. It was a difficult realization, says Ziebart, whose criticism of the Rover 75 sedan project helped trigger a management shake-up at BMW last year. Ziebart, who serves as general chairman of the SAE 2000 World Congress in Detroit, spoke candidly about the BMW-Rover merger at the 2000 Automotive News World Congress in Detroit on Jan. 18. Edited excerpts follow:

    Being at the leading edge of management trends flatters those involved.

    It usually creates excitement for the media. And the more expensive the trends are, the more valuable they are considered to be.

    But after a few years, people begin to ask themselves what it was they used to think was so great.

    Remember the diversified conglomerates in the '70s? Or the integrated technology corporations of the '80s? If they have not long since been taken apart by resourceful corporate raiders, they have at least undergone reorganization, which is usually a painful process.

    If we are to believe the scenarios presented by investment bank analysts and some members of the business press, the latest thing in management is the need for growth through mergers and acquisitions.

    A major business paper declared the year 2000 to be the Year of Mergers.

    This is supposed to be particularly true in the automotive industry. If it is, only a handful of groups have any chance of existing on their own in this competitive field.

    When KPMG analyzed major international mergers between 1996 and 1998, the results were sobering: 83 percent of the mergers did not produce any increase in shareholder value. And in 53 percent of the cases, the value actually fell.

    Although some company managers have unwittingly become caught up in this merger mania, I think it is worth taking a closer look.

    In my opinion, we at BMW definitely have something to say on this point.

    By taking over Rover six years ago, we have gathered experience that many others still have coming to them. I would like to share with you some of this experience. I want to deliberately give you a view that deviates from the modern gospel.

    I will then talk about what else a car manufacturer should do to prosper in the future.

    GENIUS

    As you all know, six years ago, the takeover of Rover by BMW was considered a stroke of genius.

    Indeed, the acquisition of Rover was a perfect match with BMW. Rover covered the lower end of the market. Land Rover is the strongest 4x4 brand. BMW was not present in those segments at that time.

    Unlike Rover, BMW has a strong international sales organization. This seemed to open up a big potential for Rover in the United States and Asia within a short period.

    On the other hand, Rover's sales organization in the United Kingdom, Italy, Spain and France was an interesting basis for excursion in the lower market segments. Rover knew the rules of the mass market while BMW had experience only in the premium segment.

    The acquisition of Rover served to realize our multibrand strategy as a means of gaining access to new market segments, which the BMW brand purposely did not cover. The BMW brand and its clear, sharply defined image would have suffered from overextension.

    With the Rover Group we acquired authentic brands rich in tradition - Land Rover, Mini, MG and Rover.

    With this brand portfolio, supplemented by Rolls-Royce from 2003 on, the BMW Group has good opportunities of operating in nearly every market segment with perfectly suited brands and products.

    Taken all these factors together, BMW and the Rover Group had a perfect fit on the macro level. And this was the reason why the takeover seemed so convincing.

    Reality sets in

    With the day-to-day work, however, friction in the organization appeared. We went into intense discussion about structures and procedures. Everybody was convinced that his way of doing business was superior.

    We made the first important discovery: This kind of fit on the macro level is not enough.

    What we neglected: Before a merger or an acquisition takes place, it must be absolutely clear what the combined enterprise will look like. Where and what are the synergies and why does the combined enterprise add more value to the market than the single ones?

    Initially, we had kept both organizations separate in order to secure the brand identities and prevent only BMW-style vehicles coming from the new company.

    Decisions took much longer than before, although clear formal structures and responsibilities had been established.

    Synergies?

    This was our second experience: We overestimated synergies to be achieved and by far underestimated the increase in complexity of the combined new business.

    When we break the problem down, we find that it had several dimensions.

    Take the often-quoted synergies in purchasing.

    We began with two companies that each had independent product ranges. With the exception of a few standardized screws, clips and small parts, there are hardly any shared parts that would lead to purchasing advantages. A complete renewal of the model range is necessary to exploit these opportunities, which takes seven to eight years.

    The short-term effect was only an increased purchasing power when dealing with mega suppliers.

    Nor can mergers be expected to bring quick savings in the sales area. Sales networks are tailored to specific turnover volumes and specific target groups.

    Neither of the two networks is rendered superfluous by a merger or acquisition.

    Despite the fact that the rapid consolidation of wholesale functions is announced with every merger (we did it, too), ultimately, efficiency increased only slightly.

    This should not come as a surprise.

    In today's world, every stage in the logistical process, from the supply of parts to the delivery of the vehicle, is controlled by information processing systems that can't be replaced overnight.

    Germans and Brits

    The increase in complexity, however, resulted in paralysis and delays in decision-making, confusion in joint coordination processes, and a lack of understanding for the partner's targets and methods.

    We blamed 'cultural differences' between Germans and British for this. We went in for cross-cultural training programs to learn about the differences in British and German management styles.

    So this is our third experience: The key problem is not cultural differences. It is differences in the main driving force in the organization.

    In any organization, there is one main driving force that determines everybody's thinking and actions. BMW is a very strong product- and technology-oriented company. The Rover Group was more process- and cost-oriented.

    When preparing a merger you have to make a fundamental decision: If you want to continue with two different corporate cultures, there is little room for synergies. If you want to fully exploit the potential synergies, one of the cultures has to vanish.

    You all know what followed.

    After a renewal in the board of management, we had to recognize that the former principle - Rover leads Rover and BMW leads BMW - did not work. Rover was not strong enough to weather the storm.

    Therefore, we decided to merge the BMW and Rover organizations completely.

    Most of the functions in BMW now are in charge of the Rover business.

    Degrees of success

    The BMW organization, dealing with this challenge, has become much stronger than before.

    When an organization is successful for a long period of time, like BMW was, it grows fat. During the past 12 months, we considerably improved efficiency in BMW also.

    In the turnaround program at Rover itself, we achieved quite a lot. We outperformed nearly every benchmark we had. Within 12 months, we cut Rover's labor force by more than 20 percent, from nearly 40,000 people to less than 30,000. Within 12 months, except for the Mini, we replaced the whole product line of Rover cars with new models. We launched the new Rover 75 at BMW-quality level, and had the highest rate of climb in any launch in the company so far.

    Lessons learned

    With this experience behind us, I think it is necessary to take a wider view on the subject of mergers in the automotive field.

    We should answer the question: What are the conditions that an automobile manufacturer must satisfy today in order to be able to compete successfully in the future?

    Much more important than the number of cars is market share in the specific segment. Economies of scale don't usually depend on absolute production figures, but on relative size within a given market segment. The segment defines the technological standards that more or less have to be met by each competitor.

    Second, it's important to be a global player. This makes it easier to deal with regional fluctuations in demand and to avoid being dependent on individual markets. That means more than just selling cars in all the world's important markets. For BMW, it means having our own subsidiaries in 27 countries, having a development network that stretches beyond Germany and Great Britain to include bases in the United States and in Japan. It means buying production materials in more than 40 countries. We operate production and assembly plants for vehicles and engines, parts and components in 19 countries.

    Finally, the fleet fuel consumption regulations in Europe will force us to enter the market for subcompact and micro cars. For manufacturers that have no experience in this market segment, taking over a competitor with a better average fleet fuel consumption might represent a feasible alternative.

    When you consider these success factors, you can see the strategic foundation for our acquisition of the Rover Group in 1994.

    The BMW brand alone fulfilled all the requirements in its segments on its own. But with the Rover Group and Rolls Royce brands, we gained even more opportunities to play the game of brands and segments.

    Regarding the merger of two companies, we have learned our lessons over the past six years.

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    Digital Edition
    THIS WEEK'S EDITION
    See our archive
    Fixed Ops Journal
    Thumbnail
    Read the issue
    See our archive
    Sign up for free newsletters
    EMAIL ADDRESS

    Please enter a valid email address.

    Please enter your email address.

    Please select at least one newsletter to subscribe.

    You can unsubscribe at any time through links in these emails. For more information, see our Privacy Policy.

    Get Free Newsletters

    Sign up and get the best of Automotive News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Now

    Get access to in-depth, authoritative coverage of the auto industry from a global team of reporters and editors covering the news that's vital to your business.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter

    Our Mission

    The Automotive News mission is to be the primary source of industry news, data and understanding for the industry's decision-makers interested in North America.

    AN-LOGO-BLUE
    Contact Us

    1155 Gratiot Avenue
    Detroit, Michigan
    48207-2997

    (877) 812-1584

    Email us

    Resources
    • About us
    • Contact Us
    • Media Kit
    • Subscribe
    • Manage your account
    • Reprints
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    Copyright © 1996-2019. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • HOME
    • NEWS
      • Dealers
        • Access F&I
        • Fixed Ops Journal
        • Marketing
        • Used Cars
        • Sales
        • Best Practices
        • Dealership Buy/Sell
        • NADA
        • NADA Show
      • Automakers & Suppliers
        • Automakers
        • Manufacturing
        • Suppliers
        • Regulations & Safety
        • Executives
        • Leading Woman Network
        • PACE Awards
        • CES
        • Management Briefing Seminars
        • World Congress
      • News by Brand
        • Aston Martin
        • BMW
          • Mini
          • Rolls Royce
        • Daimler
          • Mercedes Benz
          • Smart
        • Fiat Chrysler
          • Alfa Romeo
          • Chrysler
          • Dodge
          • Ferrari
          • Fiat
          • Jeep
          • Maserati
          • Ram
        • Ford
          • Lincoln
        • General Motors
          • Buick
          • Cadillac
          • Chevrolet
          • GMC
          • Holden
        • Honda
          • Acura
        • Hyundai
          • Genesis
          • Kia
        • Mazda
        • Mitsubishi
        • Nissan
          • Infiniti
        • PSA
          • Citroen
          • Opel
          • Peugeot
          • Vauxhall
        • Renault
        • Subaru
        • Suzuki
        • Tata
          • Jaguar
          • Land Rover
        • Tesla
        • Toyota
          • Lexus
        • Volkswagen
          • Audi
          • Bentley
          • Bugatti
          • Lamborghini
          • Porsche
          • Seat
          • Skoda
        • Volvo
        • (Discontinued Brands)
      • Cars & Concepts
        • Auto Shows
          • Detroit Auto Show
          • New York Auto Show
          • Los Angeles Auto Show
          • Chicago Auto Show
          • Geneva Auto Show
          • Paris Auto Show
          • Frankfurt Auto Show
          • Toronto Auto Show
          • Tokyo Auto Show
          • Shanghai Auto Show
          • Beijing Auto Show
        • Future Product Pipeline
        • Photo Galleries
        • Car Cutaways
        • Design
      • Shift
      • Mobility Report
      • Special Reports
      • Digital Edition Archive
      • This Week's Issue
    • OPINION
      • Blogs
      • Cartoons
      • Keith Crain
      • Automotive Views with Jason Stein
      • Columnists
      • Editorials
      • Letters to the Editor
      • Send us a Letter
    • DATA CENTER
    • VIDEO
      • AutoNews Now
      • First Shift
      • Special Video Reports
      • Weekend Drive
    • EVENTS & AWARDS
      • Events
        • World Congress
        • Retail Forum: NADA
        • Canada Congress
        • Marketing 360: L.A.
        • Europe Congress
        • Fixed Ops Journal Forum
        • Retail Forum: Chicago
        • Leading Women Conference Detroit
      • Awards
        • 100 Leading Woman
        • 40 Under 40 Retail
        • All-Stars
        • Best Dealership To Work For
        • PACE Awards
        • Rising Stars
        • Europe Rising Stars
    • JOBS
    • +MORE
      • Webinars
      • Leading Women Network
      • Custom Features
        • Ally: Do It Right
        • Guide To Economic Development
      • Classifieds
      • People on the Move
      • Newsletters
      • Contact Us
      • Media Kit