Google's autonomous car captures nuances of city driving

Google's Christopher Urmson, pictured, and the engineers in charge of self-driving software took journalists on a 25-minute loop through the city streets of Mountain View. Photo credit: Reuters

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. -- If you have ever wondered how it feels to ride through town in one of Google’s self-driving vehicles, there’s just one word to describe it: ordinary.

And that’s the extraordinary thing.

On Tuesday, for the first time since Google co-founder Sergey Brin commissioned the self-driving vehicle experiment in 2009, the technology giant pulled open the blinds to the media.

After a morning of presentations by project director Christopher Urmson and the engineers in charge of self-driving software, mapping data and vehicle testing, we journalists were taken on a 25-minute loop through the city streets of Mountain View.

Google clearly wanted to show that its cars can handle an urban environment with cyclists, pedestrians and tricky traffic maneuvers. The company said in April that its cars have traveled more than 700,000 miles under computer control, with a recent emphasis on surface roads, which Urmson described as about “100 times more difficult than freeway driving.”

As I sat in the backseat of one of Google’s modified Lexus RX 450h crossovers with test drivers in the front seats, those difficulties were nowhere to be seen. I found myself absent-mindedly and comfortably gazing out the window because it felt just like a human was in control.

Yet city driving is a delicate dance. It has hard rules, such as traffic signals and speed limits, but much of it is about drivers’ expectations -- the unwritten customs of the road: how quickly to speed up and slow down, the body language and nonverbal agreement of changing lanes.

All that must feel natural, and, at first blush, Google’s car passed the tests.

For one thing, the car knows to keep down the G-forces. It accelerates briskly from a stop, but not jarringly. It braked softly enough to be comfortable, except in one case, when we were coming down a hill and a traffic light turned yellow. The car made a snap calculation and slammed the brakes to avoid running a red light. It felt harsh, partly because of the hill, but it was probably a sensible decision.

The same goes for courtesy on the road. Google’s car knows to give other drivers and cyclists their space.

All around us, Google employees whizzed around on the multicolored bicycles that Google makes available for crossing its corporate campus. Our car approached a slow-moving bicycle on the right shoulder of the road. Rather than centering itself in a lane, as the car is normally programmed to do, it nudged over to give the cyclist a bit of extra cushion.

Then a large truck started to encroach on our lane. The car edged over again.

It showed a few other learned behaviors for safety’s sake. It waits a second or so to accelerate when a light turns green, in case a driver decides to blow through a yellow light and mistimes the maneuver. In another stab at self-preservation, Google also programmed its car to stay out of other cars’ blind spots.

Yet the Google car is not timid.

At one point, we passed a speed radar outside one of Google’s buildings. The posted speed limit was 35. As we approached, the electronic board told us we were going exactly 35. Never 34. Never 36.

I asked a test driver about that. She told me that traffic conditions permitting, Google programs its cars to move as fast as the law allows. It’s an apt metaphor for Google itself, which sees itself racing ahead of the auto industry.

You can reach Gabe Nelson at

ATTENTION COMMENTERS: Automotive News has monitored a significant increase in the number of personal attacks and abusive comments on our site. We encourage our readers to voice their opinions and argue their points. We expect disagreement. We do not expect our readers to turn on each other. We will be aggressively deleting all comments that personally attack another poster, or an article author, even if the comment is otherwise a well-argued observation. If we see repeated behavior, we will ban the commenter. Please help us maintain a civil level of discourse.

Email Newsletters
  • General newsletters
  • (Weekdays)
  • (Mondays)
  • (As needed)
  • Video newscasts
  • (Weekdays)
  • (Weekdays)
  • (Saturdays)
  • Special interest newsletters
  • (Thursdays)
  • (Tuesdays)
  • (Monthly)
  • (Monthly)
  • (Wednesdays)
  • (Bimonthly)
  • Special reports
  • (As needed)
  • (As needed)
  • Communication preferences
  • You can unsubscribe at any time through links in these emails. For more information, see our Privacy Policy.