GM's massive missed opportunity in Europe
|Luca Ciferri is Editor of Automotive News Europe.|
- Beyond the headlines, humdrum recalls annoy consumers
- Regulation vs. technology -- why are U.S. roads getting safer?
- Free of U.S. ownership, Ally expects cheaper funds, maybe more subprime deals
- Handicapping the finalists for North American Car, Truck of Year
- Why the Chinese auto shows will refocus on the car models
General Motors never should have dumped Daewoo in favor of Chevrolet in Europe eight years ago. At that time, Daewoo mainly sold low-tech, cheap-but-not-so-cheerful cars in central and eastern Europe. Had GM stuck with that plan it could have gone head to head against Renault’s low-cost Dacia brand. Instead, Dacia has had the low end of the market nearly to itself -- and has prospered immensely.
Prior to Chevrolet’s rebirth in Europe, GM spoke about capitalizing on the brand’s great heritage. To most Europeans, however, the only recognizable Chevrolet was the Corvette. It was puzzling to try to get people here to put the iconic muscle car in the same sentence as the Matiz minicar or Lanos compact.
As European-made Daewoos morphed into Korean-made Chevrolets, the new cars offered looks, performance and standard features matching those of European volume brands such as Ford, Fiat, Citroen, Peugeot and Renault.
The problem is that they were priced at the same level as their more established European rivals.
Former Chevrolet Europe boss Susan Docherty tried to move the brand more upscale. When that flopped Chevy was supposed to move down-market to protect GM's effort to revive Opel/Vauxhall.
That would not have worked because today’s Chevys can’t be sold at prices matching Dacia without causing massive financial losses. Therefore, GM’s decision to drop the brand from Europe by the end of 2015 makes sense.
It’s too bad the company abandoned Daewoo. It could have become what Dacia is for Renault: a cash cow.
You can reach Luca Ciferri at firstname.lastname@example.org.