Losing LaHood: What it means for the war on distracted driving
- Regulation vs. technology -- why are U.S. roads getting safer?
- Free of U.S. ownership, Ally expects cheaper funds, maybe more subprime deals
- Handicapping the finalists for North American Car, Truck of Year
- Why the Chinese auto shows will refocus on the car models
- FTC finds fine print too fine, imposes fines
I felt a lump in my throat reading today’s Automotive News headline: Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood to step down.
I have no political affiliation to LaHood, but I consider him my kindred spirit in our mutual concern with distracted driving.
And I worry that whoever replaces him won’t wage the same level of war against it.
Regular readers know my opposition to technology that takes a driver’s mind and eyes off the road. And that extends beyond talking or texting on a mobile phone. Like LaHood, I believe in-vehicle touch screen and voice-recognition software, such as MyFord Touch and the Cadillac CUE system to name a few, can be just as distracting to a driver as a mobile phone.
LaHood said that his department has been on a “rampage” against behind-the-wheel distractions. He believes that it’s not enough to keep hands on the wheel and eyes on the road; a driver’s mind should be on the road, too. That’s not possible if the driver is engaged in a conversation on the phone or fumbling through touch screens to adjust the temperature.
Drivers will always be subject to some level of distraction. Each time a driver changes a radio station, tweaks the climate settings or converses with another occupant, he or she is distracted momentarily.
But LaHood’s “rampage” was a big step for the industry — to bring awareness and keep the conversation going about the importance of paying attention and mitigating distractions as much as possible behind the wheel.
I hope his replacement stays the course.
You can reach Jamie LaReau at firstname.lastname@example.org. -- Follow Jamie on