Call me melancholy, but it’s truly a Saab story

DETROIT -- All I could do was wistfully think of what could have been as I drove behind a Saab 9-3 sedan on the freeway this morning.

See, I almost bought a Saab 9-3 in 2008. I had driven a redesigned 9-3 earlier that year and I loved it. General Motors still owned the brand then. I remember discussing Saab with GM Vice Chairman Bob Lutz. Our mutual fondness for the brand prompted Lutz to call Saab vehicles “neat.”

Today Saab is anything but neat. Frankly, it’s a mess.

Saab teeters on the edge of existence. To make matters worse, Consumer Reports magazine today released its review of the midsized luxury brands.

It called the redesigned Saab 9-5 “disappointing” saying it fails to measure up to competitors. The magazine said, “Despite its excellent fit and finish and fairly nimble handling, it has a noisy four-cylinder turbocharged engine, a stiff ride, impaired visibility and relatively slow acceleration.” It scored too low to be recommended.

Still, I had another chance to buy a Saab this afternoon. I was chatting with a long-time Saab dealer. He told me he has two Saab vehicles left on his lot, then half-joked that one of them could be mine. I considered it for a moment. Then I declined. He sarcastically reassured me he’d sell them -- in the next 10 months.

Many consumers don’t want to buy Saab vehicles with a cloud of uncertainty hanging over the brand’s future, this dealer says.

But there are still a few of us who have a twinkle in the eye for a Saab vehicle.

After all, this same dealer had five Saabs on his lot just a few months ago.

25

Shares

ATTENTION COMMENTERS: Over the last few months, Automotive News has monitored a significant increase in the number of personal attacks and abusive comments on our site. We encourage our readers to voice their opinions and argue their points. We expect disagreement. We do not expect our readers to turn on each other. We will be aggressively deleting all comments that personally attack another poster, or an article author, even if the comment is otherwise a well-argued observation. If we see repeated behavior, we will ban the commenter. Please help us maintain a civil level of discourse.

Newsletters