Without China, BRIC markets become BRIKT

BMW no longer uses the term BRIC -- Brazil, Russia, India, China -- for developing markets. Instead, the carmaker has a more up-to-date acronym, BRIKT, which replaces the C for China with Korea and adds Turkey.

BMW used the term for the first time at the company's annual press conference on Tuesday. It's a smart move to eliminate China because the country has been the world's largest automotive market since 2009 and, at least in automotive terms, it's impossible to still consider it a developing market.

Keeping the B for Brazil, where BMW could decide by year end to open an assembly plant; the R for Russia, where consumers are hungry for premium large sedans and SUVs; and the I for India, where the X1 compact SUV will soon be built alongside the locally made 3 series, 5 series and X3, all make sense.

It also makes sense to add K for South Korea, a market still artificially closed to foreign vehicle imports, a situation that should rapidly change after a new free trade agreement with Europe takes effect.

The same applies to Turkey, where heavy import duties hinder sales of cars built outside the country, a scenario that would radically change if Turkey joins the European Union.

Reithofer was right in changing from BRIC to BRIKT and I really hope the rest of the industry will follow, deleting China from the developing auto market list.

Last September, consultants PricewaterhouseCoopers also pointed to a new frontier in promising auto markets: the VIPEP countries. VIPEP stands for Vietnam, Indonesia, Pakistan, Egypt and the Philippines.

25

Shares

ATTENTION COMMENTERS: Over the last few months, Automotive News has monitored a significant increase in the number of personal attacks and abusive comments on our site. We encourage our readers to voice their opinions and argue their points. We expect disagreement. We do not expect our readers to turn on each other. We will be aggressively deleting all comments that personally attack another poster, or an article author, even if the comment is otherwise a well-argued observation. If we see repeated behavior, we will ban the commenter. Please help us maintain a civil level of discourse.

Newsletters