Why there are no more incentive wars

Jim Henry is a special correspondent for Automotive News
Leave it to Tom Webb, chief economist for Manheim Consulting, to come up with the best explanation I’ve heard yet why the car companies and auto lenders won’t go crazy with incentives, artificially inflate auto sales, and bring about another boom-and-bust scenario:

“Because they don’t have to.”

He pointed out in an interview on Saturday that the car companies made decent money in 2010 with U.S. light-vehicles sales of only 11.6 million, and they should make even more money this year. With lower breakeven points thanks to bankruptcy restructuring for Chrysler and General Motors, and a strategic downsizing for Ford, the car companies aren’t under pressure to produce too many cars.

Webb acknowledges the “other camp” in this argument has a pretty good argument, too: “There’s always going to be a fight for market share.”

ATTENTION COMMENTERS: Automotive News has monitored a significant increase in the number of personal attacks and abusive comments on our site. We encourage our readers to voice their opinions and argue their points. We expect disagreement. We do not expect our readers to turn on each other. We will be aggressively deleting all comments that personally attack another poster, or an article author, even if the comment is otherwise a well-argued observation. If we see repeated behavior, we will ban the commenter. Please help us maintain a civil level of discourse.

Email Newsletters
  • General newsletters
  • (Weekdays)
  • (Mondays)
  • (As needed)
  • Video newscasts
  • (Weekdays)
  • (Weekdays)
  • (Saturdays)
  • Special interest newsletters
  • (Thursdays)
  • (Tuesdays)
  • (Monthly)
  • (Monthly)
  • (Wednesdays)
  • (Bimonthly)
  • Special reports
  • (As needed)
  • (As needed)
  • Communication preferences
  • You can unsubscribe at any time through links in these emails. For more information, see our Privacy Policy.