Fitch: 2009 U.S. Prime Auto ABS Exceeding Expectations

NEW YORK (Nov. 8) -- Lower-than-expected losses for 2009 U.S. prime auto loan ABS loans are positioning this vintage for continued positive rating performance as the broader economy slowly improves, according to Fitch Ratings in a new report.

Through the first three-quarters of this year, expected cumulative net losses (CNLs) on 2009 auto ABS loans are twice as low (1.3-1.5%) compared 2008 and 2007 vintages (2.8-3%). The strong results come amid a slow start to the U.S. economic recovery and lingering fears of a double-dip recession. Fitch maintains a Positive Rating Outlook for 2009 auto ABS.

CNLs for 2009 are more likely to wind up akin to pre-recessionary vintages (2005-2006), with numerous factors driving the better-than-expected performance, according to Director Brad Sohl. However, Fitch does not expect future prime auto loan ABS credit enhancement to drop materially from 2010 levels, which are down from those of 2009.

"The wholesale vehicle market has improved significantly and job losses are slowing," said Sohl. Most importantly, "the stronger credit quality and tighter underwriting of 2009 loans were an about-face from the loan attributes that worsened 2007 and 2008 vintage auto ABS performance."

Fitch expects performance to stay largely positive even in the face of high unemployment. That said, 'future auto ABS performance remains susceptible to a potential double-dip recession and new job losses,' said Sohl.

'In Reverse: Losses on 2009 Vintage Auto Loan ABS Revert to Pre-Recession Levels' is available by clicking on the link or by going to ''.,

Additional information is available at ''


ATTENTION COMMENTERS: Automotive News has monitored a significant increase in the number of personal attacks and abusive comments on our site. We encourage our readers to voice their opinions and argue their points. We expect disagreement. We do not expect our readers to turn on each other. We will be aggressively deleting all comments that personally attack another poster, or an article author, even if the comment is otherwise a well-argued observation. If we see repeated behavior, we will ban the commenter. Please help us maintain a civil level of discourse.

Email Newsletters
  • General newsletters
  • (Weekdays)
  • (Mondays)
  • (As needed)
  • Video newscasts
  • (Weekdays)
  • (Weekdays)
  • (Saturdays)
  • Special interest newsletters
  • (Thursdays)
  • (Tuesdays)
  • (Monthly)
  • (Monthly)
  • (Wednesdays)
  • (Bimonthly)
  • Special reports
  • (As needed)
  • (As needed)
  • Communication preferences
  • You can unsubscribe at any time through links in these emails. For more information, see our Privacy Policy.