Holiday Special: Subscribe for $1.52/week.
DONNA HARRIS

Site control assaults property rights

Donna Harris covers automotive retailing forAutomotive News
As General Motors' wind-down deadline for rejected dealers approaches, I've heard horrendous stories about arm-twisting that went on behind the scenes between GM and some of its dealers.

For example, GM says that to keep your Buick-GMC franchise, you've got to give up your Cadillac store. And, not only that, you've got to sign a site control agreement for 25 years to restrict the use of the property to an exclusive GM dealership.

The same sort of arm-twisting went on between Chrysler and some of its surviving dealers. They were told they needed to sell all brands to remain viable dealers. If they were missing a brand and wanted to obtain the franchise, Chrysler made them sign a site control agreement for 30 years.

Think about it: These factories just emerged from bankruptcy. How can they demand that the properties be dedicated exclusively to their franchises — and for 25 or 30 years?

What if the best use of the property is not a GM or Chrysler store? Who can tell what's going to happen in 10 years, let alone 25 or 30?

Dealers in a number of states are lobbying for laws that prohibit forced site control. That kind of coercion attacks our fundamental property rights.

25

Shares

ATTENTION COMMENTERS: Over the last few months, Automotive News has monitored a significant increase in the number of personal attacks and abusive comments on our site. We encourage our readers to voice their opinions and argue their points. We expect disagreement. We do not expect our readers to turn on each other. We will be aggressively deleting all comments that personally attack another poster, or an article author, even if the comment is otherwise a well-argued observation. If we see repeated behavior, we will ban the commenter. Please help us maintain a civil level of discourse.

Newsletters