Holiday Special: Subscribe for $1.52/week.
DAVID BARKHOLZ

UAW dissident says some Ford workers ready to strike

David Barkholz covers IT and labor for Automotive News
Some hourly workers at Ford Motor Co. are already indicating a willingness to strike next year if the automaker doesn't restore concessions made during the auto recession, said UAW dissident Gary Walkowicz, who is opposing Bob King this week for the UAW presidency.

Interviewed at a protest before tomorrow's start of the UAW National Constitutional Convention in Detroit, Walkowicz said UAW rank-and-file are tired of concessions and he's been designated to carry that message to convention delegates.

"Ford employees still have the right to strike and I have a lot of people telling me that they're ready to," said Walkowicz, a bargaining committeeman at Ford's Dearborn Truck plant.

Walkowicz last autumn spearheaded the successful opposition to Ford concessions negotiated by the international that included a clause that would have prohibited a strike during next year's master contract negotiations with the Detroit 3. General Motors and Chrysler workers gave up their right to strike as part of concessions made before the carmakers entered Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in 2009.

Walkowicz said a profitable Ford needs to restore pay raises, bonuses and a 10-minute break period in plants that cut non-lunch breaks from 60 minutes per 10-hour work day to 50 minutes.

He said the strenuous work in auto plants makes the break reduction a big worker concern.

Concessions have not stopped the outflow of carmaker jobs outside of the United States, he said. Membership has fallen to about 355,000 from nearly 1.5 million 30 years ago.

The convention kicks off Monday, with officer elections on Wednesday. King is a shoo-in to succeed Ron Gettelfinger as president. Gettelfinger, 65, is retiring.

25

Shares

ATTENTION COMMENTERS: Over the last few months, Automotive News has monitored a significant increase in the number of personal attacks and abusive comments on our site. We encourage our readers to voice their opinions and argue their points. We expect disagreement. We do not expect our readers to turn on each other. We will be aggressively deleting all comments that personally attack another poster, or an article author, even if the comment is otherwise a well-argued observation. If we see repeated behavior, we will ban the commenter. Please help us maintain a civil level of discourse.

Newsletters