Register now for free access to - this week only.

First, admit you have a problem

DETROIT -- Mea culpa.

Things were pretty screwed up at Chrysler.

That's the flip side of the big "Chrysler business plan" extravaganza going on all day under the design dome. It's like a 12-step program.

Yeah, there are big hopes and plans for the future. (See elsewhere at

But here's what else we press, dealers, analysts, suppliers and local politicos heard:

• Dodge Nitro? Dull as dirt. Dodge chief (also design chief) Ralph Gilles showed how dumpy the existing SUV looks, and how cool it can be.

• Quality? Terrible perception, largely justified. Quality chief Doug Betts (ex-Nissan and Toyota) described a dysfunctional system that, for example, took an average of 71 days just to decide who would look into a possible quality boo-boo. He's been working on it, and he's adopting Fiat audit standards and durability testing.

• Product development? Baby-faced new engineering boss Scott Kunselman promised to use virtual tools to reduce weight and improve performance, a lot quicker than in the past. This is not cutting-edge stuff. It's really the price of entry.

• Powertrain? Fiat expat Paolo Ferrero described how Chrysler's stodgy "legacy" engines will be quickly replaced by small high-tech Fiat four-bangers and a new family of Chrysler V-6s.

Well, Gilles showed how Chrysler can -- even before getting competitive all-new vehicles -- make current cars more appealing without breaking the bank.

Identifying a problem is necessary to fixing it. But of course merely recognizing the problem is not sufficient.

Fiat/Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne has got the Chrysler team at least to the first phase of solving the problems.



ATTENTION COMMENTERS: Over the last few months, Automotive News has monitored a significant increase in the number of personal attacks and abusive comments on our site. We encourage our readers to voice their opinions and argue their points. We expect disagreement. We do not expect our readers to turn on each other. We will be aggressively deleting all comments that personally attack another poster, or an article author, even if the comment is otherwise a well-argued observation. If we see repeated behavior, we will ban the commenter. Please help us maintain a civil level of discourse.