Time for GM to get back to business


I strongly disagree. Any chance GM has for resurrection is the necessity of presenting some image, ANY image that's not the same face that has delivered the blow-by-blow color commentary of GM's fall from grace into the government-sponsored $50B jobs program it has become.

The mistake is in misinterpreting strategy for tactics. Of course, GM's future rests with product; but the American consumer is both tremendously more AND less sophisticated than many commonly presume and equally integral to GM's future.

No single initiative is a panacea for the troubles that plague GM; but that doesn't mean they are any less integral to rebuilding its brands. Yet in the absence of a "magic bullet", anything of the many things GM is doing is branded too little, too late, or off-message. Lest the value of presenting a "few face" be dismissed entirely, when did Rick Waggoner last cross anyone's mind?


ATTENTION COMMENTERS: Automotive News has monitored a significant increase in the number of personal attacks and abusive comments on our site. We encourage our readers to voice their opinions and argue their points. We expect disagreement. We do not expect our readers to turn on each other. We will be aggressively deleting all comments that personally attack another poster, or an article author, even if the comment is otherwise a well-argued observation. If we see repeated behavior, we will ban the commenter. Please help us maintain a civil level of discourse.

Email Newsletters
  • General newsletters
  • (Weekdays)
  • (Mondays)
  • (As needed)
  • Video newscasts
  • (Weekdays)
  • (Weekdays)
  • (Saturdays)
  • Special interest newsletters
  • (Thursdays)
  • (Tuesdays)
  • (Monthly)
  • (Monthly)
  • (Wednesdays)
  • (Bimonthly)
  • Special reports
  • (As needed)
  • (As needed)
  • Communication preferences
  • You can unsubscribe at any time through links in these emails. For more information, see our Privacy Policy.