When Saturn goes, so does a quarter of GM’s hybrid sales

/article/20090428/ANA02/904289968

The Saturn debate is always an interesting one because people have so many different perspectives. Here's some more food for thought.

GM destroyed a lot of its brand equity in the '70's and 80's with Vegas, the infamous X cars, the J cars of the early '80's, etc. It became clear that there was a large segment of the population that would not consider a GM brand under any circumstances -- the "import intenders". If you're in the automotive business or even read the comments on USA Today you'll know that this is true.

Saturn was conceived to get these buyers who would not normally even go to a showroom and by that measure, it was successful. It is surprising how many people -- even within GM -- didn't realize that Saturn was a part of GM so this helped avoid the GM stigma.

This "import intender" problem still exists today -- for evidence, look at he few number of Matrix buyers who actually have Vibe on their consideration list even though the products are basically the same. Try selling a Civic buyer a Cobalt.

In the end, GM wasted this opportunity by first starving Saturn of new product, then by trying to bring it into the GM fold. Companies often have divisions operating independently to create competition and foster innovation and expertise but management chose a different direction for Saturn.

Tags:

0

Shares

ATTENTION COMMENTERS: Over the last few months, Automotive News has monitored a significant increase in the number of personal attacks and abusive comments on our site. We encourage our readers to voice their opinions and argue their points. We expect disagreement. We do not expect our readers to turn on each other. We will be aggressively deleting all comments that personally attack another poster, or an article author, even if the comment is otherwise a well-argued observation. If we see repeated behavior, we will ban the commenter. Please help us maintain a civil level of discourse.

Newsletters